Court of Appeal 24 06 1873 ACTIVE
Court of Appeal 24 06 1873 ACTIVE
SUBJECT: RE: OCS307856F – FORMAL DATA SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST (DSAR), PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE NOTICE & IMMEDIATE EVIDENTIAL ENGAGEMENT
To:
Chief Constable
Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI)
PSNI Headquarters
65 Knock Road
Belfast
BT5 6LE
From:
Michael P. Lennon
Date: [21 APRIL 2026]
FORMAL NOTICE – STATUTORY DATA ACCESS, PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE & EVIDENCE SUBMISSION
I, Michael P. Lennon, hereby issue this formal Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) pursuant to:
- The UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR)
- The Data Protection Act 2018
- Applicable EU GDPR principles
This request is made under statutory authority and in contemplation of ongoing and/or prospective High Court proceedings.
URGENT NOTICE OF ATTENDANCE & EVIDENCE
Please take formal notice that I am in the process of attending, or imminently attending, a Police Service of Northern Ireland station to provide evidence concerning serious matters of concern under reference:
24/061873/01/02
This evidence is to be treated as:
- Material of significant evidential value
- Potentially relevant to ongoing or future proceedings
- Subject to strict handling, recording, and preservation obligations
You are required to ensure that:
- All interactions, submissions, and materials provided are fully recorded and logged
- Appropriate incident and reference numbers are assigned and preserved
- No evidential material is lost, mishandled, or disregarded
FULL SCOPE OF DISCLOSURE REQUIRED
You are required to disclose ALL personal data, including but not limited to:
- Incident reports, intelligence records, and operational logs
- All records relating to OCS307856F and 24/061873/01/02
- All correspondence (internal and external)
- Custody records, statements, and officer notes
- Digital records, metadata, and system logs
- Audio/visual material (CCTV, body-worn video, recordings)
- Records of third-party disclosures
- Any profiling, assessments, or decision-making data
This applies to all formats and storage systems, including archived and recoverable data.
FORMAT & STANDARD OF DISCLOSURE
All material must be supplied:
- In complete and unredacted form, subject only to lawful exemptions
- In PDF format, indexed and structured
- In a format suitable for forensic and evidential use in court
EVIDENCE PRESERVATION NOTICE (CRITICAL)
You are hereby placed under strict legal obligation to preserve ALL relevant material.
No data is to be:
- Deleted
- Altered
- Overwritten
- Concealed
Any failure in this regard may:
- Constitute evidential spoliation
- Give rise to adverse inference
- Engage statutory liability, including under the Computer Misuse Act 1990
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE
Failure to comply fully may result in:
- Complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO)
- Referral to oversight bodies
- Application to the High Court for disclosure and enforcement
- Reliance on non-compliance in legal proceedings
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
You are required to:
- Acknowledge receipt immediately
- Confirm identity verification requirements
- Provide a clear timetable for compliance
- Identify the officer responsible for handling this matter
FINAL NOTICE
This correspondence is issued formally and may be relied upon in court proceedings without further notice.
All actions, omissions, or delays will be documented.
Signed,
Michael P. Lennon LIP
FUNERAL DIRECTOR / UNDERTAKER
End of Notice
THE SUPREME BUNDLE OCS307856F Master.zip
Court of Appeal 24 06 1873 ACTIVE
The Court of Appeal also hears cases stated from certain Tribunals (e.g. Industrial Tribunals and Fair Employment Tribunal).
Department of Health
Castle Buildings
Stormont
Belfast
Northern Ireland
BT4 3SQ
For immediate attention
Subject: Formal Position – General Kitchen Standards v Holywell Standards / Demand for Full Disclosure and Presentation of Medical Records
To Whom It May Concern,
I will put this in plain English.
A basic kitchen is expected to meet standards every single day. Food is stored properly. Surfaces are kept clean. Records are kept. Hazards are controlled. If something is unsafe, it is dealt with. Not admired. Not explained away. Dealt with.
That is ordinary discipline.
It does not require a tribunal.
It does not require a bundle.
It does not require a public body to discover the concept of standards halfway through the mess.
Which brings me to Holywell.
On the face of the material now held, the contrast is stark. In a normal kitchen, poor handling, poor record-keeping, poor hygiene, poor supervision, and poor environment would be treated as failure. In Holywell, the appearance given is that these same matters were tolerated, normalised, or dressed up after the fact in paperwork and institutional language.
That is not a high standard.
That is not clinical excellence.
That is not public confidence.
That is the organisational equivalent of wiping the front counter while the bins are on fire out the back.
I hold professional catering qualifications. I know what a controlled environment looks like. I know what health, hygiene, safety, and security in a working environment are supposed to mean. In a real workplace, you do not serve poor-quality food and call it care. You do not ignore obvious environmental defects and call it acceptable accommodation. You do not treat paperwork as a substitute for standards. And you do not expect people to confuse institutional authority with operational competence.
A kitchen is judged by whether it is run properly.
A hospital should be judged by exactly the same principle.
If the food is substandard, that matters.
If the environment is neglected, that matters.
If records are poor, that matters.
If medication handling is unclear, that matters.
If patient property, documentation, and basic conditions raise questions, that matters.
Because standards are not sector-specific. Sloppiness is sloppiness whether it is under a chef’s hat or under a Trust logo.
The problem here is not that mistakes can happen. Mistakes happen anywhere. The problem is what appears to happen next: weak standards, weak explanation, and an institutional assumption that the badge on the wall should do the heavy lifting.
It does not.
In any decent kitchen, if the ceiling is stained, the records are loose, the product is poor, and the operation looks tired, management is called in and the problem is fixed. They do not produce a grand speech about process and hope nobody notices the obvious.
That is the comparison.
General kitchen standards are built on discipline, accountability, and immediate correction. Holywell, on the face of this record, appears to have operated on tolerance of avoidable shortcomings and retrospective justification.
That is not a compliment.
It is an indictment.
This is why the issue now is disclosure.
Not spin.
Not public-relations varnish.
Not another layer of professional wording to soften an ugly picture.
Disclosure.
You are now formally required to preserve, identify, disclose, and where relied upon present the full medical and administrative record relating to me from 1 October 2021 to date, including but not limited to:
- all inpatient and outpatient records
- admission and discharge material
- medication charts, prescribing records, administration records, and medicines reconciliation records
- nursing notes, ward notes, observation records, incident reports, and risk assessments
- tribunal papers, review documents, applications, hearing material, and internal summaries
- patient property records, receipts, retained-property forms, and custody documents
- complaints, responses, escalation notes, and internal communications
- maintenance records, environmental audits, food-service records, and relevant ward condition reports
- emails, memoranda, metadata, audit trails, and document histories
- any records, notes, emails, findings, recommendations, or decisions involving or attributed to Ms O’Neill
If those records have been used, relied upon, referred to, or summarised in proceedings, they should not be cherry-picked, diluted, or paraphrased into something more convenient. They should be produced in full.
If these records are being relied upon in any appeal before The Appeals Service Northern Ireland, Cleaver House, 3 Donegall Square North, Belfast, BT1 5GA, then they should be presented there properly, completely, and without selective omission.
If they are being relied upon in legal proceedings before the courts, then they should be disclosed through the proper court process at the Royal Courts of Justice, Chichester Street, Belfast, BT1 3JF.
Either way, the old institutional trick of saying less, showing less, and hoping the weakness stays buried is over.
Let the records show the food standards.
Let the records show the maintenance standards.
Let the records show the medication records.
Let the records show the incident records.
Let the records show the observation notes.
Let the records show the environmental audits, complaints, internal communications, and decision-making trail.
Because if the standards were sound, the records will rescue the Trust.
If they were not, the records will bury the excuses.
Holywell should not be harder to trust than a properly run kitchen.
And the lady who spoke to me as though I were beneath basic respect in a Belfast police station, and would not take a report of serious crime, is noted as part of the wider record.
And yet, here we are.
Yours faithfully,
Michael P. Lennon Jr
OCS307856F
Mindspire Blogs
On Point of Law!! THE SUPREME BUNDLE OCS307856F Master.zip
 HMW-AI-LIC-1984-NC-GOV

Comments