Michael P Lennon LiP (Litigant in Person) Applicant (+28 = Good Friday 3rd 2026)

April 03, 2026

Michael P Lennon LiP (Litigant in Person) Applicant (+28 = Good Friday 3rd 2026)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

KING’S BENCH Revision (NORTHERN IRELAND)

Case Reference: 24/061873

Michael P Lennon Jr (Litigant in Person)
Applicant

+28 = Good Friday 3rd 2026

APPLICATION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND RECOGNITION OF CULTURAL SUBMISSION

1. Introduction

I, Michael P Lennon Jr, acting as a Litigant in Person, respectfully apply to this Honourable Court for declaratory consideration in relation to matters of cultural, historical, and civic expression connected to Northern Ireland.

This application does not seek the creation, alteration, or enforcement of any royal, sovereign, or statutory title, but instead seeks recognition of the Applicant’s right to submit and have considered a structured cultural proposition grounded in verifiable associations.

2. Basis of Application

This application is grounded on the following:

The recognised legal status of the Applicant as a Litigant in Person
The established title of Baron Kilkeel, held by Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, which constitutes a territorial designation linked to Northern Ireland
The Applicant’s right to advance cultural, historical, and symbolic submissions within lawful and peaceful parameters

3. Nature of the Submission

The Applicant has developed a structured submission (Exhibits MPL-EX-01 to MPL-EX-30) which:

Explores the historical concept of Irish High Kingship as a cultural institution
Examines the modern symbolic relevance of leadership, unity, and public service
Proposes a non-binding, ceremonial framework of interpretation tied to contemporary figures of public influence

This submission is expressly non-justiciable in substance, but its consideration and acknowledgment fall within the broader principles of access to justice and civic participation.

4. Relief Sought

The Applicant respectfully seeks:

a. A declaration that the submission of cultural and symbolic frameworks, where clearly stated as non-legal in effect, is a permissible exercise within proceedings or correspondence before the Court

b. Confirmation that the Applicant’s materials (MPL-EX-01 to MPL-EX-30) may be received and recorded as part of the case file for contextual and evidential completeness

c. Such further or other directions as the Court deems appropriate regarding the handling, classification, or acknowledgment of non-statutory cultural submissions

5. Clarification of Scope

For the avoidance of doubt:

This application does not seek:
- The creation or recognition of a sovereign title
- Any constitutional alteration
- Any आदेश binding upon the Crown, Parliament, or Government
This application does seek only:
- Procedural clarity
- Recognition of submission rights
- Proper recording of materials within a lawful framework

6. Statement of Good Faith

I affirm that:

This application is made in good faith
All references to individuals, titles, and historical concepts are accurate and verifiable
No claim is made beyond the lawful jurisdiction of this Court